-
-
Follow Streetsblog
Recently Posted Jobs
- Principal Planner, Modeling/GIS Technology Services, 2 days ago
- Communications Manager, 5 days ago
- Manager, External Communications and Marketing, 5 days ago
- Membership Manager, 3 weeks ago
- Santa Monica Columnist, 3 weeks ago
Word On The Street
“We have to act and let the House know that this is unacceptable”
– Jerard Wright In response to "House GOP Moves to Decimate Dedicated Transit Funding"
Archived Articles
-
Recent Comments
Hot Topics
Categories
Congressional Committees
- House Committee on Energy and Commerce
- House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure
- Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs
- Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation
- Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources
- Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works
Advocacy Organizations
- Alliance for Biking & Walking
- Amalgamated Transit Union
- America 2050
- America Bikes
- America Walks
- American Institute of Architects
- American Public Health Association
- American Society of Landscape Architects
- BOMA International
- Building America's Future
- Coalition on Regional Equity (CORE)
- Congress for the New Urbanism
- Enterprise Community Partners
- Environment America
- Environmental and Energy Study Institute
- Environmental Defense Fund
- Friends of the Earth
- League of American Bicyclists
- League of Conservation Voters
- Local Initiatives Support Corporation
- Main Street Project
- National Association of City Transportation Officials
- National Association of County and City Health Officials
- National Association of Railroad Passengers
- National Association of Realtors
- National Center for Safe Routes to School
- National Coalition for Promoting Physical Activity
- National Complete Streets Coalition
- National Housing Conference
- National Housing Trust
- National Recreation and Park Association
- Natural Resources Defense Council
- PolicyLink
- Project for Public Spaces
- Rails-to-Trails Conservancy
- Reconnecting America
- Sierra Club
- Smart Growth America
- Stewards of Affordable Housing for the Future
- Surface Transportation Policy Partnership
- The National Center for Bicycling and Walking
- Trust for America’s Health
- US Public Interest Research Group
Federal Agencies
- Department of Housing and Urban Development
- Department of Transportation
- Federal Aviation Administration
- Federal Highway Administration
- Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
- Federal Railroad Administration
- Federal Transit Administration
- National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
- National Transportation Safety Board
- Surface Transportation Board
Copyright Notice
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.
pdxbugger
The Repubs are trying to run this country into the ground. Get out the vote!
in response to Massive Coalition Opposes House GOP Attempt to Eviscerate Transit
Arlen
I know it’s bad form to inject facts into a political discussion, but roads have *never* had a “positive return on investment” as Rob suggested. In fact, as Warren Buffett observed when BH bought into Burlington, no form of passenger transportation since the horse has ever had a positive return; they all are subsidized.
As for Streetless, you might want to look again. The reports from Metro Transit show 300K riders PER DAY in Seattle, hardly riderless. Maybe you just looked at the wrong route and the wrong time of day.
in response to Massive Coalition Opposes House GOP Attempt to Eviscerate Transit
fj
re: pchazzz, “What have you got against money . . . Do have problem with that?”
Yes, I have a huge problem with people’s work and industry that is essentially sociopathic with outcomes completely insensitive to the pain and hardship that they cause others.
Yes, I have a problem with that for people who work for big tobacco since smoking is projected to kill one billion people by 2050.
Yes, those who work for the fossil fuel industries directly killing millions of people each year producing toxic pollution and deadly environments, massive government corruption, wars and civil strife, with huge monopolistic strangleholds on $trillions in resources which could otherwise be used to save and improve the lives of literally billions of people, serving as the “Merchants of Doubt” longtime stopping timely action on rapidly accelerating climate change which is projected to take a huge human toll; the list goes on.
If you do not even understand this you can start with “The Dummies Guide to Climate Science” http://bit.ly/hbHxCm and when this sinks in move on to “Merchants of Doubt”.
Hope this answers your question.
in response to Who Still Likes the House Transpo Bill? Big Oil, Big Truck, and Big Box Retail
Streetless in Seattle
Finally some sanity. Folks outside of urban centers are tired of subsidizing fancy, wasteful, and under-utilized “mass transit” boondoggles (such as our shameful and riderless mess here in Seattle).
in response to Massive Coalition Opposes House GOP Attempt to Eviscerate Transit
Anonymous
Good critiques of my comments directed at Ben Goldman. With regard to Jett Marks’ comments, trains are most effective at carrying bulk cargo long distances. For smaller, high value shipments, or those which require a short shipping time, trucks are more appropriate. Just in time inventory strategies adopted by many businesses require that supplies be delivered at the exact time they are delivered to reduce storage and inventory costs. Also, many towns are not located on rail lines, so you need trucks. That expensive, Cannondale bicycle you ride was delivered in a truck!
Joe R: it would be interesting to see if the reduced cost to the consumer from Big Box is offset by the costs you mention. “Conspicuous consumption” implies wealth, but the true beneficiaries of big box stores are the working poor who cannot afford to pay a premium for “sustainable” (read expensive) products.
in response to Who Still Likes the House Transpo Bill? Big Oil, Big Truck, and Big Box Retail
Anonymous
I’m “Glad” to see that West Coast off-shore drilling is included because that may be the straw that breaks this camel’s back.
in response to Who Still Likes the House Transpo Bill? Big Oil, Big Truck, and Big Box Retail
Jett Marks
@pchazzz, Is the nation really clamoring for more jobs where you drive all the time?
If we use railroads instead of trucks, we make even more money because 1) rail transport requires much less fuel and a small fraction of the labor, 2) there is less damage to our bridges and roads, and 3) getting that freight off the highways reduces the risk of death and injury. Trucking is good for trucking and no one else.
in response to Who Still Likes the House Transpo Bill? Big Oil, Big Truck, and Big Box Retail
Jonathan Angelilli
So frustrating!
in response to Who Still Likes the House Transpo Bill? Big Oil, Big Truck, and Big Box Retail
Joe R.
@pchazzz:disqus The problem is that taxpayers clean up the mess left by Big Oil, Big Truck, and Big Box, arguably costing more than the taxes on the profits those three entities make. Nothing wrong with making money, but there are better ways to do it than with a system based on conspicuous consumption, waste, and sprawl.
in response to Who Still Likes the House Transpo Bill? Big Oil, Big Truck, and Big Box Retail
Anonymous
Elections matter y’all!
in response to Massive Coalition Opposes House GOP Attempt to Eviscerate Transit
fred
@pchazzz You have a fascinatingly myopic view of this. It sounds an awful lot like the argument that Wall Street, mortgage brokers, and banks were making prior to their house of cards imploding and wreaking havoc for years on millions of people through no fault of their own. “We’re making lots of money, so it’s got to be good”, right? I don’t think those who are unemployed, evicted, foreclosed upon, upside down on their mortgages, etc. would agree with your stance. Short terms gains for long term liabilities is never a good deal.
in response to Who Still Likes the House Transpo Bill? Big Oil, Big Truck, and Big Box Retail
Anonymous
“So, more drilling (oil companies make money) and lax regulations (trucking industry makes money) mean slightly lower shipping costs (mega-retailers make money). Big Oil, Big Truck, and Big Box — whose business models each depend on wider highways and sprawl — are the major beneficiaries of this bill.”
What have you got against making money, Ben? It means more investment in jobs and he economy. Do you have problem with that?
in response to Who Still Likes the House Transpo Bill? Big Oil, Big Truck, and Big Box Retail
Rangers100
The GOP despises cities.
in response to Massive Coalition Opposes House GOP Attempt to Eviscerate Transit
fj
Boehner’s Last Stand: House Leader Wants to Kill Transit Funding
“http://thinkprogress.org/romm/2012/02/03/418084/boehner-house-leader-kill-transit-funding/
“
in response to Who Still Likes the House Transpo Bill? Big Oil, Big Truck, and Big Box Retail
Rob
They have the ways and the means to not only ignore the urgent need to
improve and expand transit in urban areas, but to also perpetuate the
same worn out auto-oriented strategies that have shown over and over are
no longer generating positive return on investment, as they did several
decades ago. Not only are they endorsing out-dated strategies while
expecting different outcomes, but they are at the same time rolling-back
what little improvement was made – eliminating transit funding is
absurd and reflects the depth and breadth of intellectual detachment
they have from important decisions they are responsible for.
Yes, I’m in a caveman suit. I’m preparing for the direction Ways and Means is sending us – backwards . . . way back.
Keep
transit funding, ditch highway expansions, and implement variable rate
congestion pricing in combination with high quality, affordable, and
reliable transit alternatives providing service in congested urban
corridors. Keep the revenues to serve the corridors in which they are
collected – money collected in the corridor stays in the corridor for
both transit and highway capital and operating expenses.
It’s a no-brainer, but we don’t have the ways and means to support it.
in response to House GOP Moves to Decimate Dedicated Transit Funding
Rob
They have the ways and the means to not only ignore the urgent need to
improve and expand transit in urban areas, but to also perpetuate the
same worn out auto-oriented strategies that have shown over and over are
no longer generating positive return on investment, as they did several
decades ago. Not only are they endorsing out-dated strategies while
expecting different outcomes, but they are at the same time rolling-back
what little improvement was made – eliminating transit funding is
absurd and reflects the depth and breadth of intellectual detachment
they have from important decisions they are responsible for.
Yes, I’m in a caveman suit. I’m preparing for the direction Ways and Means is sending us – backwards . . . way back.
Keep
transit funding, ditch highway expansions, and implement variable rate
congestion pricing in combination with high quality, affordable, and
reliable transit alternatives providing service in congested urban
corridors. Keep the revenues to serve the corridors in which they are
collected – money collected in the corridor stays in the corridor for
both transit and highway capital and operating expenses. That’s how the system become fiscally sustainable and congested urban corridors begin to see true relief – for commuters and movement and goods.
It’s a no-brainer . . . but we don’t have the ways and means to help get us there.
in response to Massive Coalition Opposes House GOP Attempt to Eviscerate Transit
Jack
If providing money for bike/ped projects isn’t a federal responsibility, then neither is funding of any transportation projects. I plan to write a few Republicans who live in the D.C. area and ask them to get off our bike paths built with TE funding (like the Rock Creek Trail Bridge). Oh wait, none of them listen to anyone anyway except their favorite groups. Maybe if we changed LAB’s name to NRA…
in response to Amendment to Restore Bike/Ped Programs in House Transpo Bill Fails
Anonymous
It’s just a House bill. The Senate bill has a slightly different provision, though it still changes the current funding structure. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood (who is a Republican) blasted the House bill. There is going to be an ongoing battle over the final details of any transportation bill. The story isn’t finished yet.
in response to Amendment to Restore Bike/Ped Programs in House Transpo Bill Fails
Anonymous
Eek! Thanks John, I’m clearly suffering from some markup-induced legislative dyslexia.
in response to Massive Coalition Opposes House GOP Attempt to Eviscerate Transit
John Walkey
Oye! Rep. Camp is from MI not WI! Don’t get dem Badgers pissed.
in response to Massive Coalition Opposes House GOP Attempt to Eviscerate Transit
Charles_Siegel
Common error in usage:
Decimate means to destroy one-tenth of. It was a form of discipline used in the Roman army. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decimation_(Roman_army) Figuratively, it means to damage severely but not destroy completely.
Unfortunately, they are doing much worse than that to transit funding.
The correct word is “devastate.”
in response to House GOP Moves to Decimate Dedicated Transit Funding
Green2bhealthy
Our country is devolving before our very eyes. It’s time to have serious discussions with out elected officials.
in response to House GOP Moves to Decimate Dedicated Transit Funding
Lynne
I am a local govt employee for a SRTS project, but the money for my salary (and all those on our team) comes from federal SRTS funds that then go to my state DOT and then trickle down to our City department and our SRTS program. Our DOT has already said that without federal funds, our SRTS project will not continue.
in response to Amendment to Restore Bike/Ped Programs in House Transpo Bill Fails
Larry Littlefield
Why doesn’t Streetsblog note that Democrats are little better, and start describing the situation for what it is — a generational war.
Younger generations are poorer than older generations were, and will inherit the consequences of their debts. It is likely that a much smaller share want one car per adult; it is certain that they can’t afford it.
Transit use is going up because younger generations are relying on it as they enter the workforce. Transit service is going down because older generations keep running up the bills for themselves.
in response to House GOP Moves to Decimate Dedicated Transit Funding
Karen Lynn Allen
I can’t quite figure out which dark, dystopian, sci-fi fantasy world the House GOP is striving for. I’m guessing one where the air is full of hazy pollution, the infrastructure is decrepit, and the population spends all its time in vehicles without ever getting anywhere. (The Dr. Who episode “Gridlock,” for example, with sprinklings of Blade Runner, Brazil, and Wall-E for good measure?) I wonder if the folks in Washington realize these tales are meant to be cautionary rather than aspirational?
in response to House GOP Moves to Decimate Dedicated Transit Funding
Jerard Wright
We have to act and let the House know that this is unacceptable
in response to House GOP Moves to Decimate Dedicated Transit Funding
bike/ped guy
I wonder if Mr. Cantor actually rides besides for a photo op like this. And I wonder why he is on the sidewalk. Rather ironic that he is riding a bicycle on pedestrian infrastructure. Begs a few questions…
in response to Was Eric Cantor Forced to Ride This Bike?
Matt Killmoto
I hope they focus their laser on having motorists pay for highway maintenance and construction. Why should people who don’t drive be forced to subsidize highways they cannot use?
in response to Amendment to Restore Bike/Ped Programs in House Transpo Bill Fails
Robert
For most States, the bike/ped funding will never occur without it being a Federal requirement. In many States, like Missouri, the public can have no input on what the DOT actually does. It is constitutionally seperated. So unless the head of the DOT just happens to be a bicycling and walking fanatic, they will spend 0% of their funding on doing anything other than moving cars.
I spent a week in Mississippi earlier this year, there wasn’t a single piece of sidewalk on any street that was controlled by the Mississippi DOT.
This is a complete disaster and the only hope now is that we continue to have SAFETEA-LU extensions and that the democrats regain control of the House and retain the presidency.
This coming from someone who has almost always voted republican….but probably never will again.
in response to Amendment to Restore Bike/Ped Programs in House Transpo Bill Fails
Hv94941
I love the theory of Safe Routes to Schools – don’t appreciate when they aid a commuter school in forcing concrete on a street – against the desires of residents – and waste a million dollars in the process.
in response to One More Push Can Preserve Federal Safe Routes to School Funding
Ben Fried
It’s not a complete catastrophe because this bill is GOP theater, not real legislation.
in response to Amendment to Restore Bike/Ped Programs in House Transpo Bill Fails
Will
I don’t see this as a complete catastrophe. It will require big reorganization of bike advocacy resources, moving employees and funding from the federal level to the state and local levels. The ridge rule is a mistake though, that program will always be federal, and there is a need for bike and ped access on thousands of obsolete bridges.
in response to Amendment to Restore Bike/Ped Programs in House Transpo Bill Fails
Town Administrator
We have expressed our support for the Petri amendment to maintain the TE program dedicated funding. This is one of the few grant opportunities available for small historic towns like Middleburg, VA with limited fiscal resources to provide pedestrian safety and streetscape improvements.
in response to Now's the Time to Make the House Bill Better for Walking, Biking, and Transit
Chris G.
Still think a Republican Congress is good for Bike/Ped? Pfft!
in response to Why a Republican Congress is Good For Bike Advocates
Brandi
Also giving more money to state DOT’s is not the answer. They ignore the job-creating urban areas of the coutnry and spend it in the rural areas of their state. Look at New York constantly cutting funding to the MTA and building a huge Tappan Zee without transit. Our look at Christie, funneling money for ARC to highways.
in response to House Transportation Bill Officially Drops, Lands With a Thud
Brandi
This is what is wrong with Washington. The democrats always hammer out a compromise which the Republicans participate in crafting and then reject. They then move further right and pretend the compromise is the Dem’s position. This continues to drive the dialogue further and further right. This transportation bill is so backward it might as well have had a provision promoting the use of horse and buggy via a gold panning tax. Seems like the whole transportation dialogue has gone to hell in the last 4 years. Sad. Shame Obama is the only adult in the room.
in response to House Transportation Bill Officially Drops, Lands With a Thud
Angie Schmitt
Yes thank you. The House bill would not include any discretionary
funding, according to our sources. So TIGER would not be funded through
the surface transportation bill. It is possible the program could
continue to be funded through other appropriations as it currently is.
in response to Now Open for Bids: The Fourth Round of TIGER Grants
RR
TIGER is not funding out of the surface transportation authorization bill. It is always funded through the annual appropriations bill. Therefore, it’s not accurate to say that the T&I bill would eliminate funding for this program — the funding never comes from T&I.
in response to Now Open for Bids: The Fourth Round of TIGER Grants
Dlovaas
While I favor these amendments, given the loooong list of terrible ideas in the bill, aren’t they just putting makeup on a corpse?
in response to Now's the Time to Make the House Bill Better for Walking, Biking, and Transit
Guest
Shouldn’t Streetsblog be all over this Florida pileup?
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/01/us-highway-deaths-florida-idUSTRE81015U20120201
in response to Today's Headlines
Jcourtneyd3
pastel. Supposedly, you will have a rfid magnet thing to touch when you walk on the bus,
It would be smart to make you pay to enter the station then to exit the station, similar to subways
thats the most efficient i think. (no paying on the bus!)
in response to New Plans Would Make Detroit the Nation's Run-Away BRT Leader
Randall Myers
The bill refers to “bicycling” or “pedestrian” 14 and 15 times, respectively. It would have been nice if they used those words for more than just a way to get to 800 pages.
This is a waste of paper. Why can’t congress simply say, “states: we will give you less money but lift the restrictions on it’s use. If you need to build transit, do that; if you can create better biking and walking infrastructure, go ahead; If you need to replace roads and bridges that are deteriorating, do what needs to be done”?
Congress, please simplify this mess so that states and localities have more freedom to make the best decisions for their residents.
in response to House Transportation Bill Officially Drops, Lands With a Thud
D Levinger
I will be interested to see a list of the organizations endorsing this bill as introduced. I see that AEM (Assn of Equipment Mfrs) is supporting it. Who else? This may help gage the challenge of opposing it.
in response to House Transportation Bill Officially Drops, Lands With a Thud
Tanya Snyder
So frustrating! The Senate actually did the dirty work of hammering out difficult compromises in order to get a consensus bill that could bring together the likes of Barbara Boxer and James Inhofe. But the House is still playing these partisan games, even with only two months left before the extension expires. There goes the last shred of hope of passing a long-term bill by March 31.
And, thanks Ben, for bringing us the news! It’s such a treat to get to just READ Streetsblog for a change!
in response to House Transportation Bill Officially Drops, Lands With a Thud
Dlovaas
Here is my new question: The revenue from drilling will take years and most likely fall far short of what’s needed. So presumably tens-of-billions of dollars will have to be borrowed, contributing to the nation’s deficit. And it’s being touted as a “jobs bill.” So I would like House Republicans to explain to fiscal conservatives (a camp I find myself in, increasingly): How is this not the same thing as the President’s stimulus bill (with a highway focus and lots of awful policy)?
in response to House Transportation Bill Officially Drops, Lands With a Thud
Andrew Guthrie
“making sure each state gets its fair share, as defined by their contributions INTO the fund”–ALL 50 STATES get more Federal highway money than they contribute in terms of motor fuels taxes. How is this possible? Massive subsidization from the General Fund. Since Uncle Sam is already in the business of spending tens of billions of everyone’s income tax dollars a year to benefit the roughly 50% of the entire population with valid driver’s licenses (yes, that stat is correct, check it out), the Federal government absolutely has a legitimate interest in how those dollars are spent.
in response to House Transportation Bill "a March of Horribles"
greengirl
Knowing what to do is not as hard has convincing residents that they should put up with some through traffic on their residential streets. Living on a loop or cul de sac has become synonymous with safety for a lot of people. This seems to be the root of sprawl; once you prohibit all through traffic in neighborhoods, you get big roads & strip malls. How to tell them you’re not trying to endanger their kids by building a connected street network…
in response to New Urbanists Release Principles for Sustainable Street Networks
Lee Munnich
Great job Lewis! John Doan showed these videos a the TRB Annual Meeting during our Sunday workshop on Multimodal Pricing: Interplay of Transit, Managed Lanes, and Congestion Pricing.
in response to An Animated Argument For Congestion Pricing
Bill Barlow
the Senate banking committee version summary that I read made one disturbing commentHOV is no longer eligible for State of Good Repair, unless the HOV is “reserved” for public transportation.
Personally, I think HOV will do more for transit in NC (and probably the SE) than any other initiative. Yes it is great to get transit priority but usually there is not enough buses in HOV to justify an exclusive lane. Especially when HOV is in its infancy, we need 2+ occupancy to fill the lane up enough to avoid public outcry. We also need every opportunity to pitch as much FTA funds into this Highway funded HOV projects as possible.
in response to What Will the Senate Bill’s Transit Section Look Like?
john
Pedestrian-cyclists are predictably endangered species in a culture that respects cars over people. It is amusing to watch drivers trying to walk from their cars to shops… really sad.
in response to Anti-Sprawl Doctor to Host PBS Series on Urban Design and Public Health