<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Urbanist Case Against Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dc.streetsblog.org/2010/01/29/urbanists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dc.streetsblog.org/2010/01/29/urbanists/</link>
	<description>Your daily source for national transportation policy news and analysis.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:57:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rejected</title>
		<link>http://dc.streetsblog.org/2010/01/29/urbanists/comment-page-1/#comment-126881</link>
		<dc:creator>rejected</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dc.streetsblog.org/?p=69361#comment-126881</guid>
		<description>@ J Winton, can you address this conundrum?: Last summer I applied for and was rejected for a refinance loan on a property I have &gt;20% equity in by my original purchase price and ~50% by current assessments. Credit rating &gt;=800. Wanted to go from 30 yr fixed to 15 with a lower interest rate and get a lower monthly payment too. The loan was rejected after about 2.5 months for the reason that the sq footage was below the min. for FHA loans.  However I wasn&#039;t applying for an FHA for the refinance; and The property (a condo) is in an FHA approved building; and I originally purchased it 10 yrs ago with an FHA. I didn&#039;t follow up b/c a death in the family took my emotional resources. But I was left with the impression that if I wanted to/needed to sell this property I wouldn&#039;t be able to b/c it doesn&#039;t meet the current min. sq footage for someone else to get a loan to buy it. Do you know anything about this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ J Winton, can you address this conundrum?: Last summer I applied for and was rejected for a refinance loan on a property I have &gt;20% equity in by my original purchase price and ~50% by current assessments. Credit rating &gt;=800. Wanted to go from 30 yr fixed to 15 with a lower interest rate and get a lower monthly payment too. The loan was rejected after about 2.5 months for the reason that the sq footage was below the min. for FHA loans.  However I wasn&#8217;t applying for an FHA for the refinance; and The property (a condo) is in an FHA approved building; and I originally purchased it 10 yrs ago with an FHA. I didn&#8217;t follow up b/c a death in the family took my emotional resources. But I was left with the impression that if I wanted to/needed to sell this property I wouldn&#8217;t be able to b/c it doesn&#8217;t meet the current min. sq footage for someone else to get a loan to buy it. Do you know anything about this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J Winton</title>
		<link>http://dc.streetsblog.org/2010/01/29/urbanists/comment-page-1/#comment-124301</link>
		<dc:creator>J Winton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 16:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dc.streetsblog.org/?p=69361#comment-124301</guid>
		<description>As a residental underwriter, I think this is a good idea. To compensate for a risky collateral, the credit, capacity and capital needs to be strong. If the customer had 680+ credit, 30% downpayment with reserves and ratios of 28/36, this would be an acceptable risk. If someone gave me $50 Million or more as seed money, I would be agreeable to lending to people who meet these qualification on mixed use property.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a residental underwriter, I think this is a good idea. To compensate for a risky collateral, the credit, capacity and capital needs to be strong. If the customer had 680+ credit, 30% downpayment with reserves and ratios of 28/36, this would be an acceptable risk. If someone gave me $50 Million or more as seed money, I would be agreeable to lending to people who meet these qualification on mixed use property.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

