<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Big Transit News: Bush-Era Rule Tossed, Enviro Benefits on the Table</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dc.streetsblog.org/2010/01/13/big-transit-news-bush-era-rule-tossed-enviro-benefits-on-the-table/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dc.streetsblog.org/2010/01/13/big-transit-news-bush-era-rule-tossed-enviro-benefits-on-the-table/</link>
	<description>Your daily source for national transportation policy news and analysis.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:57:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Onitsuka Tiger</title>
		<link>http://dc.streetsblog.org/2010/01/13/big-transit-news-bush-era-rule-tossed-enviro-benefits-on-the-table/comment-page-1/#comment-423145</link>
		<dc:creator>Onitsuka Tiger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 07:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dc.streetsblog.org/?p=64291#comment-423145</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the strategies you have discussed here. Also, I believe there are numerous factors which really keep your auto insurance premium straight down. One is, to consider buying vehicles that are within the good set of car insurance companies. Cars that are expensive are more at risk of being snatched. Aside from that insurance is also depending on the value of your car, so the more pricey it is, then higher a premium you only pay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the strategies you have discussed here. Also, I believe there are numerous factors which really keep your auto insurance premium straight down. One is, to consider buying vehicles that are within the good set of car insurance companies. Cars that are expensive are more at risk of being snatched. Aside from that insurance is also depending on the value of your car, so the more pricey it is, then higher a premium you only pay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Placemaking Institute</title>
		<link>http://dc.streetsblog.org/2010/01/13/big-transit-news-bush-era-rule-tossed-enviro-benefits-on-the-table/comment-page-1/#comment-117711</link>
		<dc:creator>Placemaking Institute</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dc.streetsblog.org/?p=64291#comment-117711</guid>
		<description>Ditto to Jarrett&#039;s response; livability is going to be as impossible to define as sustainability...but at least it&#039;s a beginning in the movement towards Progress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ditto to Jarrett&#8217;s response; livability is going to be as impossible to define as sustainability&#8230;but at least it&#8217;s a beginning in the movement towards Progress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noelle</title>
		<link>http://dc.streetsblog.org/2010/01/13/big-transit-news-bush-era-rule-tossed-enviro-benefits-on-the-table/comment-page-1/#comment-117301</link>
		<dc:creator>Noelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dc.streetsblog.org/?p=64291#comment-117301</guid>
		<description>This is indeed a needed adjustment. It appears that the slant of funding is still pointed towards larger, metropolitan areas. Rural areas need transportation operating assistance as well. The above article didn&#039;t even mention rural areas, RTPAs, etc... although I could be missing something since I don&#039;t know everything there is to know about this effort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is indeed a needed adjustment. It appears that the slant of funding is still pointed towards larger, metropolitan areas. Rural areas need transportation operating assistance as well. The above article didn&#8217;t even mention rural areas, RTPAs, etc&#8230; although I could be missing something since I don&#8217;t know everything there is to know about this effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jarrett at HumanTransit.org</title>
		<link>http://dc.streetsblog.org/2010/01/13/big-transit-news-bush-era-rule-tossed-enviro-benefits-on-the-table/comment-page-1/#comment-115861</link>
		<dc:creator>Jarrett at HumanTransit.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 00:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dc.streetsblog.org/?p=64291#comment-115861</guid>
		<description>Great in theory, but transit advocates are divided on this, because FTA hasn&#039;t really explained how it&#039;s going to quantify livability, not to mention economic benefit of development that might or might not happen in response to a transit project.  

See here, especially the comments:

http://www.humantransit.org/2010/01/big-news-on-us-federal-transit-funding.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great in theory, but transit advocates are divided on this, because FTA hasn&#8217;t really explained how it&#8217;s going to quantify livability, not to mention economic benefit of development that might or might not happen in response to a transit project.  </p>
<p>See here, especially the comments:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.humantransit.org/2010/01/big-news-on-us-federal-transit-funding.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.humantransit.org/2010/01/big-news-on-us-federal-transit-funding.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art Cohen for b'more mobile</title>
		<link>http://dc.streetsblog.org/2010/01/13/big-transit-news-bush-era-rule-tossed-enviro-benefits-on-the-table/comment-page-1/#comment-115721</link>
		<dc:creator>Art Cohen for b'more mobile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 16:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dc.streetsblog.org/?p=64291#comment-115721</guid>
		<description>In order to promote livability in communities, this proposed re-prioritization and expansion of factors to be considered in evaluating local transportation projects for federal funding is long overdue.  Congratulations to the Obama Administration for being flexible enough to propose them both.  Cost-effectiveness has for too long had primacy as the principal criterion for project evaluation. We hail the downward shifting of weight to be given this factor relative to other factors.  Also, we hail the proposed addition of environmental and economic benefits as factors to be considered for such funding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In order to promote livability in communities, this proposed re-prioritization and expansion of factors to be considered in evaluating local transportation projects for federal funding is long overdue.  Congratulations to the Obama Administration for being flexible enough to propose them both.  Cost-effectiveness has for too long had primacy as the principal criterion for project evaluation. We hail the downward shifting of weight to be given this factor relative to other factors.  Also, we hail the proposed addition of environmental and economic benefits as factors to be considered for such funding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: v</title>
		<link>http://dc.streetsblog.org/2010/01/13/big-transit-news-bush-era-rule-tossed-enviro-benefits-on-the-table/comment-page-1/#comment-114951</link>
		<dc:creator>v</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 00:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dc.streetsblog.org/?p=64291#comment-114951</guid>
		<description>fantastic news!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fantastic news!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

