<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Today&#8217;s Headlines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dc.streetsblog.org/2009/11/02/todays-headlines-128/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dc.streetsblog.org/2009/11/02/todays-headlines-128/</link>
	<description>Your daily source for national transportation policy news and analysis.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:57:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Smith</title>
		<link>http://dc.streetsblog.org/2009/11/02/todays-headlines-128/comment-page-1/#comment-87791</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 09:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dc.streetsblog.org/?p=43761#comment-87791</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I don&#039;t get it. They could be ineligible for matching funds because they&#039;re starting early?&lt;/em&gt;

no. it would be because the project will not meet federal guidelines for funds, including adequate environmental review. start tomorrow if you like -- just make sure the env review, and the other requirements, are taken care of first.

&lt;em&gt;And Oberstar thinks it&#039;s okay for them to lose this eligibility?&lt;/em&gt;

no. that&#039;s why he told them to fix it.

that&#039;s, at least, my reading of it. the whole scenario is a bit confusing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>I don&#8217;t get it. They could be ineligible for matching funds because they&#8217;re starting early?</em></p>
<p>no. it would be because the project will not meet federal guidelines for funds, including adequate environmental review. start tomorrow if you like &#8212; just make sure the env review, and the other requirements, are taken care of first.</p>
<p><em>And Oberstar thinks it&#8217;s okay for them to lose this eligibility?</em></p>
<p>no. that&#8217;s why he told them to fix it.</p>
<p>that&#8217;s, at least, my reading of it. the whole scenario is a bit confusing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cap'n Transit</title>
		<link>http://dc.streetsblog.org/2009/11/02/todays-headlines-128/comment-page-1/#comment-87761</link>
		<dc:creator>Cap'n Transit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 14:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dc.streetsblog.org/?p=43761#comment-87761</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;There had been worry that M1 Rail&#039;s original intention to begin construction by the end of this year would jeopardize the matching-funds idea because work would begin before federal requirements on environmental studies would be finished on the city&#039;s segment.

It appears Oberstar shares those same concerns.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I don&#039;t get it.  They could be ineligible for matching funds because they&#039;re starting early?  And Oberstar thinks it&#039;s okay for them to lose this eligibility?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>There had been worry that M1 Rail&#8217;s original intention to begin construction by the end of this year would jeopardize the matching-funds idea because work would begin before federal requirements on environmental studies would be finished on the city&#8217;s segment.</p>
<p>It appears Oberstar shares those same concerns.</p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t get it.  They could be ineligible for matching funds because they&#8217;re starting early?  And Oberstar thinks it&#8217;s okay for them to lose this eligibility?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

