<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deja Vu: Congress Could Put Off Deal on Transport Bill Until Next Month</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dc.streetsblog.org/2009/09/24/deja-vu-congress-could-put-off-deal-on-transport-bill-until-next-month/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dc.streetsblog.org/2009/09/24/deja-vu-congress-could-put-off-deal-on-transport-bill-until-next-month/</link>
	<description>Your daily source for national transportation policy news and analysis.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:57:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike  Mossing</title>
		<link>http://dc.streetsblog.org/2009/09/24/deja-vu-congress-could-put-off-deal-on-transport-bill-until-next-month/comment-page-1/#comment-84111</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike  Mossing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dc.streetsblog.org/?p=31111#comment-84111</guid>
		<description>Looking through HR 3617,  I can&#039;t find any mention of restoration of the $87 billion dollar rescission described in FHWA Notice 4510.711.

Does HR 3617 allow the rescission to stand?

We have a $500,000 dollar TE project on the chopping block. It fell just short of the state deadline to obligate the funds.

Anxious to know the prospects for rescue of these rescinded funds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking through HR 3617,  I can&#8217;t find any mention of restoration of the $87 billion dollar rescission described in FHWA Notice 4510.711.</p>
<p>Does HR 3617 allow the rescission to stand?</p>
<p>We have a $500,000 dollar TE project on the chopping block. It fell just short of the state deadline to obligate the funds.</p>
<p>Anxious to know the prospects for rescue of these rescinded funds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

