<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Klobuchar &amp; Webb: Dems&#8217; Unlikely Opponents of Bike-Ped Investment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dc.streetsblog.org/2009/09/16/the-democrats-you-wouldnt-expect/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dc.streetsblog.org/2009/09/16/the-democrats-you-wouldnt-expect/</link>
	<description>Your daily source for national transportation policy news and analysis.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:57:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: NattyB</title>
		<link>http://dc.streetsblog.org/2009/09/16/the-democrats-you-wouldnt-expect/comment-page-1/#comment-82691</link>
		<dc:creator>NattyB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dc.streetsblog.org/?p=28451#comment-82691</guid>
		<description>RE: Mykle&#039;s point

Hmmm, why would a Senator opt out of funds for bikes and peds and plow those funds into highways?  

Rank speculation on my part, but, I would assume that their are certain favored road/highway developers that are also big campaign contributors.  Follow the money.  I wonder if propublica has anything on stuff like this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: Mykle&#8217;s point</p>
<p>Hmmm, why would a Senator opt out of funds for bikes and peds and plow those funds into highways?  </p>
<p>Rank speculation on my part, but, I would assume that their are certain favored road/highway developers that are also big campaign contributors.  Follow the money.  I wonder if propublica has anything on stuff like this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NattyB</title>
		<link>http://dc.streetsblog.org/2009/09/16/the-democrats-you-wouldnt-expect/comment-page-1/#comment-82671</link>
		<dc:creator>NattyB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dc.streetsblog.org/?p=28451#comment-82671</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m surprised Elana didn&#039;t bring this up following her mentioning of the Wicker Amendment: 

Great, we can now carry ammo on Amtrak.  What about bikes?  If you want to take a bike on a train in the NE Corrider on Amtrak, you have to put it in a frickin bike box.  That frustrates the $hit out of me.  But, great, we can bring ammo.  Why are our Congresspeople so damn stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised Elana didn&#8217;t bring this up following her mentioning of the Wicker Amendment: </p>
<p>Great, we can now carry ammo on Amtrak.  What about bikes?  If you want to take a bike on a train in the NE Corrider on Amtrak, you have to put it in a frickin bike box.  That frustrates the $hit out of me.  But, great, we can bring ammo.  Why are our Congresspeople so damn stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mykle</title>
		<link>http://dc.streetsblog.org/2009/09/16/the-democrats-you-wouldnt-expect/comment-page-1/#comment-82641</link>
		<dc:creator>mykle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dc.streetsblog.org/?p=28451#comment-82641</guid>
		<description>Um, yes it does.  Go read the article again.  The Feds (elected by us) already decided to spend 10% of Federal transportation funds (paid by us) on alternatives to driving (for us); Klobuchar wanted to actively block that in her state, and suck up the mandated alternative transit funds back into highways.  WTF?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, yes it does.  Go read the article again.  The Feds (elected by us) already decided to spend 10% of Federal transportation funds (paid by us) on alternatives to driving (for us); Klobuchar wanted to actively block that in her state, and suck up the mandated alternative transit funds back into highways.  WTF?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://dc.streetsblog.org/2009/09/16/the-democrats-you-wouldnt-expect/comment-page-1/#comment-82631</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dc.streetsblog.org/?p=28451#comment-82631</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to see continued Federal support for bike facilities.  But, I can understand Klobuchar&#039;s position: just because you like something doesn&#039;t mean you expect the Feds to pay for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to see continued Federal support for bike facilities.  But, I can understand Klobuchar&#8217;s position: just because you like something doesn&#8217;t mean you expect the Feds to pay for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

